Documents menu
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 97 00:26:25 CST
From: rich@pencil.UTC.EDU (Rich Winkel)
Subject: Russian teachers strike
/** headlines: 147.0 **/
** Topic: Russian teachers strike **
** Written 11:21 AM Jan 21, 1997 by josue in cdp:headlines **
/* Written 11:51 AM Jan 21, 1997 by austgreen@glas.UUCP in labr.cis */
/* ---------- "Russian teachers strike" ---------- */
From: austgreen@glas.apc.org
Russian teachers strike for wage pay-out
By Renfrey Clarke, Green Left Weekly, 21 January
1997
For more than three million Russian school pupils, the
end of the annual winter holidays in mid-January brought
something quite different from the usual orderly resumption of
classes. Some students did not return to class at all, as
teachers who had gone unpaid for months vowed to keep their
schools shut until salaries were paid up in full. For many more
pupils, the first week back was a turbulent period as their
teachers cancelled lessons and joined in protest meetings.
Leaders of the Trade Union of Science and Education Workers
reported that 437,000 teachers, about a tenth of the total, took
part in strike action. Educational establishments were affected
in 66 of Russia's 89 administrative regions. According to the
news agency Interfax on January 15, teachers at 159 schools opted
for indefinite stoppages. Many other teachers' collectives
decided that the beginning of classes, due for January 13, should
be put back by a week. In numerous cities across Russia,
education and science workers demonstrated outside government
offices.
At the best of times Russia's schoolteachers, who are
overwhelmingly women, receive abysmal pay. The average wage for
teachers is currently about 540,000 rubles a month - less than
US$100 - compared with a national average wage of 850,000 rubles.
Recognising that the pay scales were scandalous, the government
in August 1995 legislated wage increases. But then the
authorities failed to make any provision for the extra payments
in the 1996 state budget.
Protests by teachers during 1996 extracted from the government a
pledge that all money owed to teachers from the federal budget
would be paid by January 1. The promise, however, was not kept.
According to the Moscow daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta on
January 11, the wage debt owed to teachers had risen by almost
1.5 trillion rubles (about US$270 million) during the previous
month, to a total of more than 6 trillion.
Nor are unpaid wages the whole extent of the teachers'
grievances. "The unions complained that schools were in a
deplorable state,'' the English-language Moscow Times
reported on January 17, "with 30 per cent of secondary schools
and 40 per cent of pre-school establishments in need of general
repair.''
An important element in the situation is that the wages of most
Russian educators are not paid directly from the federal budget,
but pass through the accounts of regional authorities. Whether
the wages are then paid out depends on the needs and priorities
of the local administrations. In general, "donor'' regions -
those which record a net surplus of payments to the federal
budget - have a much better record of paying state employees on
time than those with a net deficit. A BBC report stated that the
situation with regard to teachers' pay was particularly serious
in parts of Chita, Novosibirsk, Arkhangelsk, Amur and Bryansk
provinces, where teachers had not been paid for six to nine
months.
Recognising that education workers had been driven to the point
where they posed a political danger, the federal authorities met
the strikes with concessions. On January 16 First Deputy Finance
Minister Andrei Petrov pledged that the sums owing to teachers
from the 1996 federal budget would be paid by the end of the
month. The federal pay wagon is thus to stop for the teachers, as
it has been forced to stop periodically for coal miners, health
workers and others dependent on the national budget or on federal
subsidies. But state spokespeople have continued to stress that
most of the wage debt is owed by regional authorities; it is to
these officials, the logic runs, that teachers should from now on
address their claims.
Outside the House of Government in Moscow, a picket of some 500
education and science workers on January 13 seemed unconvinced
that the federal government lacked the power to make regional
authorities meet their wage bills. The situation, in any case,
had grown too desperate for teachers to be content with
petitioning local satraps.
"We eat nothing but potatoes,'' Nezavisimaya Gazeta
reported picketing teachers as complaining. "Or we run up debts
in the shops, where they give us bread and grains....''
"We get payments in kind - for example, for all the work she's
done a teacher gets a refrigerator. But what use is a
refrigerator if there's nothing to put in it?''
"In the school there's no money to buy light bulbs or even
chalk. There's one textbook for every three students, and pupils
faint from hunger.''
Ominously for the government, one particular line of reasoning
has clearly been gaining ground among the teachers: only direct
protest action is capable of securing results. "Every time
there's a public protest they give us our pay,'' instructors from
the Moscow Aviation Institute told Nezavisimaya Gazeta.
"We just hope it's the same this time.''
|