The contemporary political history of the Republic of Yugoslavia
(to February 2003)
Hartford Web Publishing is not the author of the documents in
World History Archives and does not
presume to validate their accuracy or authenticity nor to
release their copyright.
In 2002, Yugoslavia was renamed the Federation of Serbia-Montenegro
and in February 2003, Serbia-Montenegro became an independent state.
In June 2006, that federation ended.
- LA Times commentary on Milosevic's
election in 1990
- By Louis Proyect. Annotations on Carol J. Williams,
Los Angeles Times, article, Wednesday 12
December 1990. Proyect: This article is extraordinary for
the way it obfuscates what was occurring in former
Yugoslavia on the eve of the outbreak of war, while still
providing useful information that can be gleaned by
reading between the lines.
- Imperialist Roots of the War in
Yugoslavia
- By Jim Genova, People's Weekly World,
12 August 1995. Suggests it is not simply old ethnic and
religious hostility that causes the war in Yugoslavia, but
contemporary interests of the UK, USA, Germany and
France.
- Yugoslav left gains, right-wing
emboldened
- By Gregory Stefanovich, People's Weekly
World, 7 December 1996. The elections in Serbia and
Montenegro.
- Protests in Belgrade and throughout
Yugoslavia–1996/1997
- From the Balkan Peace Team, Belgrade, 10 December 1996
and, part II, 23 January 1997. The elections, protests,
students, tactics (45 Kb).
- Protests Weaken Regime In Belgrade
- By Argiris Malapanis, The Militant, 27
January 1997. The regime of Socialist Party chief Slobodan
Milosevic annulled results of the November 17 ballot, when
the opposition coalition called Zajedno (Together) claimed
it won majorities in 14 of the Yugoslav republic's 19
largest cities. An unprecedented wave of daily protests
against this antidemocratic move erupted immediately in
Belgrade and 30 other cities.
- NATO strikes: analysts predict rise in Slav
nationalism
- By Sergei Blagov, InterPress Service, Asia
Times, 26 March 1999. Yeltsin: NATO air strikes
against Serbian military targets could have unexpected
consequences, notably the rise of Slav nationalism. Prime
Minister Yevgeny Primakov declared that the air strikes
would not bring stability to Kosovo.
- Bombing the baby with the
bathwater
- Editorial by Veran Matic, 30 March 1999. NATO's
bombs have blasted the germinating seeds of democracy out
of the soil of Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro and ensured
that they will not sprout again for a very long time.
- Impacts of NATO's
“Humanitarian” Bombing
- By Michel Chossudovsky, Press concerence release,
National Press Theater, Ottawa, Monday 12 April
1999. Amply documented, the bombings of Yugoslavia are not
strictly aimed at military and strategic targets as
claimed by NATO. They are largely intent on destroying the
country's civilian infrastructure as well as its
institutions.
- Political Crisis in Serbia: Movements from
the South
- BETAweek, E1, 8 July 1999. Serbia's political crisis
strongly accelerated at the beginning of this week, and, to
all appearances, the momentum it gained could weaken
further the positions of the ruling left and Yugoslav
President Slobodan Milosevic.
- Yugo opposition leader savages KFOR, US and
Europe
- Agence France Presse, 22 July 1999. Yugoslav opposition
leader Vuk Draskovic launched a verbal broadside against
the United States, Europe and the KFOR peacekeepers in
Kosovo. KFOR is closing its eyes to the atrocities
committed against the Serbs by the Albanian terrorists,
supports the anti-European and anti-democratic forces in
Serbia, notably Slobodan MilosevicHe.
- Two Decades Later Tito's Heritage In
Ruins
- By Vesna Peric Zimonjic, InterPress Service, 2 May
2000. Twenty years after the death of Josip Broz Tito,
symbol of post-World War II Yugoslavia and liberal
communism with a human face, his heritage is literally in
pieces. Serbia, the country where Tito lived for 35 years
and is buried, is now among the most isolated countries
due to the politics of the regime of President Slobodan
Milosevic.
- Life in Yugoslavia (including Kosovo) one
year after the bombing ended
- By Josina Dunkel, International Action Center, 22 August
2000. Last year, for 78 days, NATO bombed Yugoslavia. They
used the usual catch words, saving small nations,
defending democracy, and the ultimate oxymoron, the
humanitarian war.
But it was not a war for ideals,
it was a war to control the Yugoslavian economy and to
eliminate the sovereignty of this Balkan country.
- How Kostunica Was Chosen (excepts)
- Der Spiegel, 9 October 2000. December 17
last year, German Minister of Foreign Affairs Fischer and
US Secretary of State Albright met the Yugoslav opposition
figures in Berlin on the fringes of the G-8 meeting. Among
the participants was Zoran Djindjic and Vuk Draskovic,
both Milosevic opponents. The opposition was given a
thorough balling out for their disunity.
- Interview with Mihajlo Markovic, former
vice president of the Socialist Party of Serbia
- Interview by Tanja Djurovic, Belgrad, for Junge
Welt, 11 October 2000. The Velvet Revolution. The
issue of Serbian transformation. Interference by the
U.S. Contribution of the left to inner weakness. Serbian
nationalism impact. Why America is criticizing
Kostunica. Role of left in future struggle against
U.S. globalization.
- Tito's dream dies
- Editorial, The Independent, 6 June
2002. The decision by what remains of Yugoslavia to vote
itself out of existence brings to an end a particular
chapter in modern history. On the one hand, the
consignment of Josip Broz Tito's dream to the past is
also a clear sign of how nightmarish that dream had
become.