National Coalition Party chairman Ville Itälä says that his party must
challenge Finland's Social Democratic power structures
.
Speaking at the autumn meeting of his party's council in Helsinki on Saturday, Itälä indicated that he would challenge the Social Democrats, after Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen (Centre) had said in a newspaper interview on the previous day that the Centre Party should give up its role of challenger of the SDP.
Itälä said that the Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions (SAK)
has far too much influence in Finland's consensus society
,
and that the SDP enjoys political hegemony
in Finland.
In his view the Social Democrats are acting as spokesmen
for
the SAK.
Itälä lashed out at centralised incomes agreements, which he said did not benefit those with middle incomes. He also said that the agreements do not meet the challenges facing Finland in the future, such as unemployment, the ageing of the population, and international tax competition.
Itälä lamented Finland's high taxation, weak purchasing power,
bureaucracy, and the deterioration of public services. He described
the consensus society as a greased slide
in which it is easy to
slip downward because of illness or unemployment, but hopeless to rise
up again.
Itälä said that the Social Democratic social model also hurts entrepreneurs, who should be allowed to prosper—and even to get rich. He feels that now there are no incentives for enterprise, even though increasing the number of entrepreneurs is, in his view, crucial for Finland's future.
Itälä faulted efforts to make services more efficient at the expense
of employees; he said that the right way to achieve better public
services would be to dismantle society's monopoly
.
The Social Democrats have become the preservers of these
structures. In fact, the forces of reaction are to be found in the
SAK-SDP axis
, Itälä said.
We must dare challenge these structures. We must dare protect
people who want to study, work, and do business
, he declared.
The National Coalition Party Council discussed Itälä's ideas for about two hours. Reactions were all positive. Several speakers applauded the plain speaking, which was attributed to the greater freedom that the party has now that it is in opposition.