WILBUR M FRIDELL is Associate Professor of Japanese religion in the Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara. He is the author of Japanese Shrine Mergers, 1906–12 (Tokyo. Sophia University, 1973) He has published articles in Monumenta Nipponica and the Journal of Asian Studies, and he reviews for the Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Because of its extreme political sensitivity, the Japanese phenomenon
retrospectively called State Shinto was the object of very little
critical study during the State Shinto period
itself
(1868–1945). This was especially true of Japanese scholars, and
among foreigners, even Daniel Holtom's excellent work focused too
narrowly on the nationalistic roles of Shinto shrines.
Now that more objective postwar studies are appearing, it is possible to reappraise the place of State Shinto (a) within the Shinto world; and (b) beyond the Shinto world, in the larger context of Japanese nationalism.
Within the Shinto world, this essay deals particularly with the relationship between State and Shrine Shinto because of the distressing tendency of Western scholars to confuse, or virtually equate, these two types of Shinto during the pre-1945 decades. Granted, there were large areas of overlap between them, but also significant areas of divergence.
Moving beyond the Shinto world as such, State Shinto is placed within
the broader context of Japanese nationalism as a whole. While State
Shinto did in fact serve as one major component of Japanese
nationalism, it combined with extra-Shinto elements (e.g.,
Confucianistic ethics) under the larger umbrella of kokutai (national
essence, characteristics). It is more comprehensively accurate,
therefore, to speak of kokutai nationalism
than of Shinto
nationalism.
Until such fundamental relationships as these are clarified, research in prewar Shinto will inevitably suffer confusions and ambiguities. This article is a quest for orientation in these matters.