From LABOR-L@YORKU.CA Tue Jun 20 06:41:36 2000
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:50:53 -0400
Reply-To: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@YORKU.CA>
Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@YORKU.CA>
From: Charles Brown <CharlesB@CNCL.CI.DETROIT.MI.US>
Subject: Korean summit
To: LABOR-L@YORKU.CA
The June 12 meeting of the two Korean presidents in Pyongyang, capital of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), was greeted by peace organizations as a step toward ending the 50-year confrontation on the peninsula.
The meeting also countered Clinton administration claims that the
U.S. needs an anti-missile system to defend against the DPRK, which it
brands a rogue nation.
DPRK President Kim Il shook hands with South Korean President Kim Dae Jung during a welcoming ceremony at the Pyongyang airport June 12.
Kim Jong Il has unleashed a diplomatic offensive to strengthen the DPRK’s relations with countries around the world. He recently visited Beijing. Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to visit Pyongyang this month, rebuffing Clinton Administration attempts to deploy a ballistic missile defense (BMD) in violation of the 1972 ABM Treaty.
Joe Volk, executive director of the American Friends Service
Committee, said, This meeting is a very good initiative. What we
need on the Korean peninsula is an end to the Cold War through threat
reduction, confidence building and identifying areas of cooperation
between the north and the south. It might lead to mutual security and
in the not too distant future reunification of Korea
He added, We doubt very much if North Korea poses a real threat to
U.S. security that justifies spending billions of dollars for an
anti-missile system.
Kim Dae Jung served prison terms under successive right-wing regimes in Seoul. A worldwide movement, joined by the DPRK, forced the regime to free him.
South Korean trade with the DPRK, which was zero in 1989 reached $333 million in 1999. As of April 7, some 210,000 people from South Korea had visited Mount Kumgang (Diamond Mountain) in the DPRK, among the most beautiful peaks in the world and revered as a symbol of Korean unification.
The summit of the two Kims
comes during a period of agonizing
reappraisal of the role of the U.S. in the Korean War. The Pentagon is
attempting to discredit an Associated Press report buttressed by
eyewitnesses that U.S. soldiers massacred unarmed Koreans whom they
had herded under the No Gun Ri bridge. The DPRK’s Korean Central
News Agency released a report on the history of the Korean War
reminding readers that the Pentagon, and Gen. Douglas MacArthur, had
schemed to escalate the Korean War into World War III by crossing the
Yalu River.
The plan was to draw People’s China and the Soviet Union into
the war and then retaliate with nuclear weapons. I.F. Stone provides
massive documentation of this plan in his Hidden History of the
Korean War.
Half a century later, the U.S. still deploys 40,000
troops and hundreds of nuclear weapons in South Korea.
Mary Day Kent, executive director of the U.S. Section of the
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), told
the World that her group favors negotiations to end the Korean War,
which has been going on for decades.
The South Korean section of WILPF is very concerned about human
rights issues in South Korea and also about the process of
renegotiation of the ’Status of Forces Agreement.’ This is
an indication that the U.S. plans to maintain its military forces in
Korea into the future
, she said. We are extremely concerned and
opposed to the revival of an anti-ballistic missile proposal, which is
both destabilizing and ineffective.
Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Nuclear
Weapons and Power in Space, told the World, There is a fresh breeze
blowing. It runs counter to the claim that North Korea is ready to
launch a nuclear attack against the rest of the world.
He accused the CIA of attempting to whip up hysteria against North
Korea. They have revised their estimates on how long it would take
the North Koreans to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile to
justify immediate deployment of Star Wars. This has been a fabrication
from the start.
President Clinton is under mounting pressure to reject the new version of Star Wars. On June 12, 33 eminent scholars of U.S.-Russian relations sent a letter to Clinton initiated by the Council for a Livable World.
We believe the current plans for the National Missile Defense
program may undermine U.S. security and further aggravate
U.S. relations with Russia,
the letter warned. We urge you not
to endorse deployment at this time.
Signers include Timothy Colton and Marshall Goldman, leading Russia scholars at Harvard; Arthur Hartman, former Ambassador to the Soviet Union, and John Steinbruner, an arms control expert.
Meanwhile, 46 physicists and engineers, organized by the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Congress that the Star Wars scheme should be shelved.
What’s on the books at this point is simply not adequate and
never will be,
said Lawrence Jones, a physicist at the University
of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
The scientists charged that the Pentagon has deliberately
simplified
tests in hopes of proving that the anti-missile
missile can pick out the real incoming missile from thousands of
tin-foil decoys. Not one test has succeeded.