The Second Half of 1948:The Sharon-Ya'Alon Plan
Official declarations and many reports in the Israeli media indicate that the Israeli military and political leadership are aiming, eventually, at a total destruction of the Palestinian authority, and, with it, the process of Oslo, which is now dominantly considered by them a 'historical mistake'. Let us trace some of the background for this development.
Ever since the 1967 occupation, the military and political elites
(which have been always closely intertwined in Israel) deliberated
over the question of how to keep maximum land with minimum Palestinian
population. The leaders of the '1948 generation' - Alon, Sharon,
Dayan, Rabin and Peres - were raised on the myth of redemption of
land. But a simple solution of annexation of the occupied territories
would have turned the occupied Palestinians into Israeli citizens, and
this would have caused what has been labeled the demographic
problem
- the fear that the Jewish majority could not be
preserved. Therefore, two basic conceptions were developed.
The Alon plan consisted of annexation of 35-40% of the territories to
Israel, and self-rule or partnership in a confederation of the rest,
the land on which the Palestinians actually live. This plan originated
with those who thought that it is impossible to repeat the 1948
'solution' of mass expulsion, for moral as well as world public
opinion considerations. The second view, whose primary spokesman was
Sharon, assumed that it is possible to find more acceptable and
sophisticated ways to achieve a 1948 style 'solution' - it is only
necessary to find another country for the Palestinians, such as
Jordan, and to make sure that as many as possible of them will move
there. This was a part of Sharon's global worldview by which Israel
can establish new orders
in the region (see the Lebanon war).
In Oslo, the Alon plan route triumphed, where gradually it became
apparent that it is even possible to extend the Arab-free
areas. In practice, the Palestinians have already been dispossessed of
half of their lands, which are now state lands, security zones and
land reserves for the settlements
. However, it appeared that
Israel will be satisfied with that, and will allow the PA to run the
enclaves in which the Palestinians still reside. The security
establishment expressed full confidence in the ability of the
Palestinian security forces - which were created and trained in
cooperation with the Israeli ones - to control the frustration of the
Palestinians and protect the security of the settlers and the Israeli
home front.
But the victory of the Alon plan wasn't complete. Even the little that
the Palestinians did get, seemed too much to some in the military
circles, whose most vocal spokesman in the early years of Oslo was
then chief of staff, Ehud Barak. Another consistent voice which has
emerged is that of Brigadier Moshe (Bugi) Ya'alon, who is also known
for his connections with the settlers. As head of the military
intelligence -Aman- (1995-1998), Ya'alon confronted the subsequent
chief of staff, Amnon Shahak, an Oslo supporter, and has consolidated
the anti-Oslo line which now dominates the military intelligence
view. Contradicting the Shin Bet position and the many media reports
about security cooperation between Israel and the Palestinian
authority, Ya'alon claimed in a cabinet meeting in September 1997, and
later, that Arafat is giving a green light to terror
.
The objection to the Oslo conception in the military circles was based on the view that it will be impossible to maintain such an arrangement in the long term. If the Palestinians have a political infrastructure and armed forces, they will eventually try to rebel. Therefore, the only way is to overthrow the Palestinian authority, and the whole Oslo conception. The first step on this route is to convince the public that Arafat is still a terrorist and is personally responsible for the acts of all groups from the Islamic Jihad to Hizbollah.
During Barak's days in office, Ya'alon became one of his closets
confidants in the restricted military team which Barak has assembled
to work with (Amir Oren, Ha'aretz, Nov 17, 00). The same team was
prepared already at the beginning of the Intifada for a total attack
on the Palestinian authority, on both the military and the propaganda
levels. On the later, this included the White book
on the
crimes of Arafat and the PA. This is the same team which is now
briefing the political level, as well as US representatives, and is
responsible for the dominance of the call for toppling the PA.
In modern times, wars aren't openly started over land and water. In
order to attack, you first need to prove that the enemy isn't willing
to live in peace and is threatening our mere existence. Barak managed
to do that. Now conditions are ripe for executing Sharon's plan, or as
Ya'alon put it in November 2000, for the second half of
1948
. Before we reach that black line, there is one option which
was never tried before: to leave the occupied territories now.