Documents menu
Message-ID: <350597DA.2DD4@ratree.psu.ac.th>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:43:22 -0800
From: Dave Patterson <pdavid@ratree.psu.ac.th>
Organization: SAAN (Southern Alternative Agriculture Network), Thailand
To: mai-not@flora.org
Subject: Asia-Pac consumer coalition opposes MAI
Sender: owner-mai-not-mail@flora.org
<http://www.bangkokpost.net/today/100398_News11.html>
Consumer groups call for right prescriptions to fight problems. Programmes cause hardship to people
By Tanida Sirorattanakul, in the Bangkok Post,
Tuesday 10 March 1998
Consumer organisations in the Asia-Pacific region
severely affected
by the current economic turmoil have called on their
governments
and international financial institutions,
particularly the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank, to review their
prescriptions
which the organisations claimed have caused great
hardship to
consumers in the region.
About 100 consumer protection advocates and
representatives of
consumer organisations and non-government
organisations working
on human rights, women's rights and environmental
issues, recently
met in a two-day conference on "The Economic Crisis
in Asia: The
Causes, the Impact and Confronting the Challenges".
The
conference was held in Penang, Malaysia, by the
Consumer
International Regional Office for Asia and Pacific
(CI ROAP).
The IMF's prescriptions for Thailand, Indonesia and
South Korea
were heavily criticised and questioned at the
meeting.
Martin Khor Kok Peng from the Consumer Association
of Penang
(CAP) blamed the IMF's policy to rush Asian
countries into financial
liberalisation though they were not ready and its
proposal for an
interest rate increase to solve their financial
problems as major
causes of the region's current economic crisis.
"Since the IMF's precription has severely affected
our well-being,
we, as a consumer, have all the rights to press for
its reform, " said
the CAP secretary and research director.
He added consumer organisations had to think what
should be done
by the IMF and launch campaigns to bring it about.
Song Vo Kyung, president of the Citizen's Alliance
for Consumer
Protection of Korea (CACPK), fully agreed with him.
"For Korean people, the IMF is like an evil. When we
heard about
Thailand's crisis situation, we never knew it would
happen to
(South) Korea. It's the right time for consumers to
press our
government to do the right thing," he said.
The conference ended with 13 conclusions and
recommendations to
be proposed as a global policy campaign by the
Consumer
International and as guideline for consumer
organisations in troubled
economies to press their governments for changes.
One of its conclusions was that domestic weaknesses
including
over-investment in the property sector and stock
markets and wrong
government policies were partly to blame for the
Asian crisis, but a
large part of the problem was due to untimely and
misplaced
financial liberisation, especially government
permission for local
banks and companies to borrow from abroad without
adequate
regulations.
The meeting recommended that governments review
their financial
liberisation policies and make changes where
necessary, and that
banking, financial and corporate laws be
strengthened and strictly
enforced to safeguard consumer interests and ensure
a stable
financial system.
It called on the international community to respect
the right of
developing countries to determine their own
financial management
policies free of external pressure. It also demanded
that the
international community introduce effective measures
to curb
currency speculation.
The conference said the IMF's bailout conditions
were causing great
hardship to consumers, labourers and and the public
in general. High
interest rates and removal of subsidies on food and
other essential
goods and services had brought about great social
dislocation, it said
adding that unless the IMF changed its policies and
became more
transparent, there would be more public pressure for
its closure.
It also asked developed countries not to pressure
Asian countries
affected by the crisis to disallow or discourage
"buy local"
campaigns.
The conference said it rejected any attempt to
further liberalise
international investment flows without commensurate
regulations
and obligations on cooperation, and therefore was
against the
Multilateral Agreement on Investment under
discussion in the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD)
as well as attempts to start negotiations on an
investment agreement
at the World Trade Organisation.
After the conference, a working group on economic
crisis which
includes 17 Consumer Internationl experts was
organised to develop
a policy campaign in line with the conference's
recommendations.
For MAI-not subscription information, posting guidelines and
links to other MAI sites please see http://mai.flora.org/
|