From worker-brc-announce@lists.tao.ca Fri Sep 1 08:58:31 2000
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 23:47:38 -0400
From: Art McGee <amcgee@igc.org>
Subject: [BRC-ANN] Quote of the Day: Adam Fairclough
Sender: worker-brc-announce@lists.tao.ca
Precedence: bulk
To: brc-announce@lists.tao.ca
<http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jah/87.1/fairclough.html>
The NAACP’s decision to abandon equalization for integration
involved a strategic decision to attack Jim Crow at what appeared to
be its most vulnerable point. Given its (virtually) consistent
opposition to legally imposed segregation, the decision was entirely
consonant with the organization’s basic philosophy. As Walter
White put it, segregation was economically unsound and...works
against the development of mutual respect and understanding.
Moreover, given the central role of Jim Crow laws in perpetuating
racial discrimination, it is difficult to see how blacks in the South
could have destroyed white supremacy without attacking segregated
schools.
Still, the shift from equalization to integration produced profound
misgivings among black educators. Du Bois argued that most Negroes
would prefer a good school with properly paid colored teachers, to
forcing children into white schools which met them with injustice and
discouraged their efforts to progress.
And he predicted that if
any outside power forced white and colored children in the same
schools, the result would be turmoil and uprising as would utterly
nullify the process of education.
He was correct on the second
point, and probably right about the first. Moreover, many blacks,
especially in the Deep South, viewed their schools and colleges with
pride; built at great personal cost, they provided jobs, leadership,
and community facilities. For black southerners, integration was a
leap in the dark.
Adam Fairclough
Black Teachers in the Jim Crow South
Journal of American History
June 2000