From editor@haiti-progres.com Mon Oct 8 19:24:02 2001
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 23:15:36 -0500 (CDT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Haiti_Progr=E8s?= <editor@haiti-progres.com>
Subject: This Week in Haiti 19-29 10/03/01
Article: 127821
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
economic terrorism,
This Week in Haiti,
The city of Gonaoves, where Haiti's declaration of independence was signed in 1804, is considered a symbol of resistance, and it was there that President Jean Bertrand Aristide celebrated the anniversary of the Sept. 30 coup d'état which overthrew him ten years ago.
In a festive ambiance, thousands of people greeted him at the southern entrance to the city, in the Descahos neighborhood. From there Aristide walked, escorted by the large crowd, to the city's Toussaint L'Ouverture police headquarters. The day's activities continued on Arms Square, where Aristide delivered his speech for the occasion.
Capitalizing on Washington's declared war on terrorism
after
the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, he
noted how the coup leaders which toppled him for three years - -
Gen. Raoul Cidras, Gen. Philippe Biamby and Col. Joseph Michel
Frangois among others -- were political terrorists. His not-so- subtle
insinuation was that the powers which backed the putschists were too.
It is time that these modern terrorists stop squeezing the
country,
Aristide declared.
Even before this year, Sept. 11 already was a date identified with terror in Haiti. On that date in 1988, a mob of armed men linked to the military dictatorship burned down St. Jean Bosco, the church of then Father Aristide, murdering and wounding dozens of parishoners.
Aristide barely escaped with his life.
During the coup in 1993, in the middle of a Sept. 11 mass commemorating the 1988 massacre, assassins dragged Antoine Izmery, a democracy activist, out of another church and executed him in the middle of a street with a bullet through the head.
Referring to these events and the Sept. 30 coup, Aristide condemned
terrorist acts in any form. He then said he considered the blockage of
international aid to Haiti since last year, due to a contrived
electoral crisis, as an act of economic terrorism.
He charged
the modern terrorists
as being responsible for the current
dilapidated state of Haiti. After his first election on Dec. 16, 1990,
we worked peacefully and democratically to climb out of poverty but
they organized the Sept. 30, 1991 coup d'itat,
Aristide
said. If we hadn't had the Sept. 30th coup, today how many people
would be better in the country? How many people would have already
escaped poverty? How many people would have escaped unemployment?
How many would already be literate?... The 1991 coup was a crisis which should never happen again on Haitian soil, never, never, never again.
Then, in even more pointed remarks, he referred to the
laboratory,
code [word] in Haiti for Washington's
media-military-intelligence complex.
We carried out the May 21 elections,
Aristide said, referring
to parliamentary and municipal contests swept
by his party, the Lavalas Family (FL), last year. The same old
colonialist mentality in the laboratory fabricated a false crisis [to
undermine the overwhelmingly fraud-free and well- attended election],
which is holding us as a people, as a nation, by the throat.
Noting that the people's misery is growing, he recalled that Haiti has already paid $8 million in interest on loans which the Inter-American Development Bank has not yet released due to the so-called crisis.
Aristide established a parallel between the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks
in the U.S. and the fate of the Haitian people. The United States
is victim of terrorism,
he said. We too are victims of
terrorism... All those who are hungry, who are poor and suffer now
because of the coup d'itat are victims of the terrorism of the
army,
which he dissolved in 1995.
The Haitian government has also used the historical moment to renew
its calls for the return of Emmanuel Toto
Constant, the leader
of the CIA-paid paramilitary death squad FRAPH during the coup, who
now lives and works in Queens, New York with Washington's protection.
The United States wants bin Laden,
said FL Sen. Girald Gilles.
We demand Emmanuel
Toto
Constant.
President Aristide is right to characterize the authors and agents of
the 1991 coup as political terrorists
and the unjustified
economic sanctions of the international community
as economic terrorism.
But when he complains of the lack of
justice like a mere demonstrator, one is justified in wondering why he
doesn't act, being, after all, the head of state.
Worse still, Aristide used the Gonaoves rally to portray a surrender
as a victory. He claimed that the Haitian government had finally taken
possession of the FRAPH documents, a trove of some 160,000 documents
which U.S. soldiers stole from the offices of FRAPH and the Haitian
Armed Forces (FAdH) in 1994 and spirited off to Washington. The
documents include the 'trophy' photographs of torture victims,
audio and videotapes of torture sessions, membership applications for
FRAPH, passports, identification cards, and business records,
as a
Sept. 29 press release of the London-based Haiti Support Group (HSG)
reminded.
Despite subsequent requests by the Haitian government, by
international human rights organisations, and by the United Nations,
for this evidence to be returned to Haiti in its entirety, it remains
in US possession.
Washington has insisted that it would only
return the documents with the names of U.S.
citizens deleted, which a U.S. ambassador said was 2% of the
collection, equivalent to about 3,200 pages. This is just what it did.
The documents which the Aristide's present government accepted are the censored collection, it seems, which previously had been refused by Haitian authorities. What's more, these documents were accepted by the Haitian government back in March, according to Sen. Gilles.
Why is this giant concession only being announced now?
Furthermore, Aristide has chosen to welcome terrorists,
both
economic
and political,
into his government. Or at least
their accomplices.
Planning Minister Marc Bazin acted as Prime Minister of Cidras's
terrorist
military regime, and Justice Minister Garry Lissade
was legal counsel to both Cidras and Michel Frangois, advising them
during the 1993 Governors Island negotiations.
Meanwhile, Commerce Minister Stanley Thiard is more of an economic
terrorist,
having held the same post under President for Life
Jean-Claude Baby Doc
Duvalier and having embezzled $4.5 million
from public coffers, according to an official 1986 Haitian government
investigation. He bilked the Haitian treasury with the connivance of
Frantz Merceron, one of Duvalier's most notorious and corrupt
super-ministers, who himself stole about $60 million in public funds
from 1983-85 when he was Finance Minister, according to the Haitian
government's own legal documents.
Ironically, Frantz Merceron visited Haiti for the second time on
Oct. 1 despite voluminous government dossiers detailing his
corruption. Why was he not arrested and charged for economic
terrorism
? The same for Thiard. If Haiti had the millions they
stole, surely thousands of Haitians from would already be
literate.
There are many other signs of hypocrisy. The government recently forked out $1.734 million for a luxurious villa for Prime Minister Jean-Marie Chirestal, which, after a stink was made, was hastily declared the official residence of the Prime Minister.
Could this sum -- or a portion of it -- not have better served the launching of the new literacy campaign in the Artibonite Valley, which Aristide touted in his Gonaoves speech? The real estate purchase makes Chirestal's gesture to donate a month's salary -- $2,800 (70,000 gourdes) -- to launch the literacy campaign look rather demagogic.
In another possible example of Lavalas impunity, Stanley Thiard has been accused of transferring two openly Lavalas employees from Commerce to the Post Office and of rehiring a former FRAPH member chased out of the ministry on Aristide's return in 1994.
As usual, the coup anniversary was an occasion for human rights groups and popular organizations to make their pronouncements.
The September 30 Foundation, the Platform of Haitian Human Rights Organizations, the Valiant Women of Marigot, and other countryside-based organizations all issued statements.
Doesn't the state have the duty to lead investigations, prevent
criminal action and avoid the second offense?
asked the National
Coalition for Haitian Rights (NCHR) about the climate of insecurity
which even last year's famous Raboteau trial has not stamped out.
The World March of Women 2000 presented a somber assessment of the past 10 years: impunity, deception, humiliation, poverty, unemployment, worsened by corruption and waste of the states meager resources on projects which are far from being priorities, like the acquisition for millions of dollars of sumptuous residences for Prime Ministers and former presidents.
Meanwhile, Jean Robert Pierre Louis of the St. Jean Bosco Small Church
Community took the official line: We would ask what the nations
which are friends of Haiti want. Is it to fight only against
terrorists which sow grief in their countries, or is it to fight
terrorism around the world in all its forms?
As for Amnesty International, after having noted the degradation of
the human rights situation in Haiti, it conceded that: From all
evidence, the situation in human rights matters is not as dramatic as
it was during the years following the coup d'itat...
But the country has not completely solved the serious problems inherited from the years of military rule.
Every group makes an observation, each more dramatic than the next, and then waits for Sept. 30... 2002. Meanwhile, the Haitian people continue to endure the violence of free-roaming criminals encouraged by impunity and the excuses of those they elected to work on their behalf and to struggle for the ideals of justice, participation and transparency.