Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 21:48:26 +0000
From: Rebecca Riehm <rsriehm@mailbox.syr.edu>
Subject: Sentence in Capt. Rockwood Court-Martial
5:30 PM EST, May 14
The jury in the court-martial of Capt. Lawrence Rockwood reconvened for sentencing deliberations Sunday afternoon. After motions by the defense, they removed themselves to ponder Captain Rockwood's fate. About 3:00 PM, court reconvened. Capt. Rockwood stood as Judge Newberry read the sentence.
After the sentence was announced, Capt. Rockwood spoke to human rights representatives and the press.
My sentence in the court martial was dismissal (equal to dishonorable
discharge) from the service with a forfeiture of 2/3 pay and allowances.
I am, of course, planning to appeal.
Although it may sound strange, I am not entirely relieved by the sentence of no confinement. As a soldier by vocation, I always considered dismissal as the most adverse penalty. The sentence is however not surprising: it is consistent with my command's desire to conceal their inaction as far as the inspection of Haitian prisons is concerned.
More important than my career, I am concerned that the US Army is
attempting to marginalize the Nuremberg principles in the most subtle and
quiet manner possible. Indeed, during the seven-day trial, the government
side insisted that personal and command responsibility for human rights
violations is irrelevant for American military personnel. The prosecution
never departed from the mantra of force protection uber alles. From
General McClellan to General Powell, generals take refuge in this mantra
when required to carry out missions they are not excited about.
Rebecca S. Riehm
rsriehm@mailbox.syr.edu
Whatever you do may seem insignificant, but it is most important that you
do it.
- Gandhi