indefinitely
When graffiti asking the US to stay in Haiti for 50 years appeared on walls in Haiti, many suggested that it was orchestrated by US Psychological Operations forces to enhance the image of the US occupation among Haitians and American TV viewers. However, it turns out that some in the US military really do want to stay in Haiti beyond Feb. 1996, when the US/UN military forces are supposed to clear out.
According to an article in the Mar. 31 edition of The Wall Street
Journal, US officials are actively planning for a long-term
occupation. The UN mandate, they say, may have to be extended,
and a few companies of US infantry may be needed indefinitely to
keep Haiti quiet,
said the newspaper. One US general told the
Journal's reporter that a long-term presence of perhaps 500
troops would be a small price to pay to ensure stability in a
region so close to the US.
On Apr. 11, the UN military
commander, US Maj. Gen. Joseph W. Kinzer, echoed these reports,
saying that UN troops might have to remain longer given what we
have invested in this enterprise here
in Haiti. It would be a
shame to pass up the opportunity for this country to get its feet
on the ground and start on the journey toward democracy and self-
government,
Kinzer dead-panned. In other words, Haiti now needs
less self-government so it can have more self-government.
President Aristide would now do well to ponder the size of the
foot he has allowed in Haiti's door.
US planners, though, might be in for a surprise. Only days after
President Aristide led crowds of Haitians through his chronic
chant of Thank you, President Clinton
during the latter's Mar.
31 visit to Haiti, growing opposition to the US occupation
erupted into open clashes between demonstrators and US forces in
Port-au-Prince. On Apr. 7, outside a US military base near the
Port-au-Prince airport, US and UN soldiers fired tear gas into a
crowd apparently protesting over jobs. The troops were attacked
with a barrage of rocks. No injuries were immediately reported,
but the debris-covered airport road was closed for hours. There
is no unemployment office. There is nothing we can do but block
this road. Then maybe they will hear us,
one protester told The
Associated Press.
Again, on Apr. 10 and Apr. 11, hundreds rallied outside Camp
Democracy,
setting up barricades. We don't want elections. We
want jobs. We want to eat,
one news article quoted the
protesters as saying. You cannot have an election with hungry
people.
The demonstrators called on the government to improve
the people's standard of living and slammed Prime Minister Smarck
Michel. US Brig General James T. Hill, the deputy commander of US
forces in Haiti, spoke with the protesters and promised - in an
ironic twist - to communicate their concerns to President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, according to Reuters.
Symptomatic of the deteriorating situation in Haiti was the US
Coast Guard's capture of 138 Haitians and Dominicans on a boat
just 25 miles off Miami, the largest interception of refugees
since President Aristide returned to Haiti last October. The
Coast Guard claimed they stopped the boat because it was
dangerously
overcrowded. The group of 126 Haitians and 12
Dominicans left Cap Haitien on Mar. 27 in a 45-foot boat and were
intercepted on Apr. 6, the Coast Guard said. Two of the Haitians
were flown to Miami for medical treatment. All of the other
passengers were returned Apr. 8 to Port-au-Prince.
Meanwhile, the US-financed municipal and parliamentary elections,
which had been set for Jun. 4, will be pushed back another three
weeks, the government of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide
announced this week. The move represents another blow to the
Lavalas bourgeoisie, since time works against their strategy of
using Aristide's personal popularity to sweep the occupation
elections.
In fact, the elections are only adding gasoline to the fire under
Aristide's presidential throne. Parties ranging from social-
democratic to Duvalierist are bitterly challenging the
composition of the Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) and
regional voting bureaus, saying they are stacked with
sympathizers of the Organisation Politique Lavalas (OPL), which
represents Aristide and the Lavalas bourgeoisie. The CEP also
faces deliberately sluggish funding from the US government and an
intimidation campaign of threats and violence from hard-line
Duvalierism, all in a climate of deepening economic hardship and
insecurity. (See Occupation Elections Bound For Trouble,
Haiti
Progres, Mar. 29, 1995.) After an Apr. 6 meeting with General
Kinzer, UN officials, and more than 20 political parties, the CEP
decided to extend the deadlines for voter and candidate
registration. The ballot for the entire Chamber of Deputies,
two-thirds of the Senate, some 130 municipal councils, and 660
municipal councils will now supposedly take place on June 25. The
runoff elections will be pushed back to July 16. The elections
were originally slated for last December.
The postponement comes as little surprise, and there will be
more, especially with respect to the Presidential elections now
set for December. Despite Aristide's sycophancy toward President
Bill Clinton, his embrace of the occupation, and his government's
adoption of one of the hemisphere's most severe International
Monetary Fund austerity programs, the US government still does
not trust the Lavalas sector and is devising its elimination
through elections. One opening for voting fraud came to light
when Anselme Remy, the Lavalassian president of the CEP,
complained Apr. 3 that the ballots for the Haitian elections will
be printed in California rather than Haiti. If US election
engineers want to print up thousands of extra ballots to
influence
the outcome on election day, the task is now much
easier. The CEP disagreed with Washington's printing dictates,
but, said Remy, it has become clear that the money is US money.