Date: Sat, 17 Dec 1994 21:25:08 -0800
From: Arthur R. McGee
(amcgee@NETCOM.COM)
Subject: Haiti Info v.3, #6 ARISTIDE TRAPPED
To: Multiple recipients of list AGE-L (AGE-L@uga.cc.uga.edu)
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Dec. 16 - The actions taken by President Jean- Bertrand Aristide and his government over the past few weeks illustrate more vividly than ever the extent to which he is trapped in a cage he helped construct.
Recent decrees, agreements with the World Bank, overtures to the
private sector, calls to the public to help
the government find
justice and the shuffling of de facto personnel are evidence that, as
the U.S. and its allies here continue to restrict his movements,
Aristide is attempting to create space for himself. Despite his efforts,
however, he has less and less margin of maneuver.
Aristide is following the dictates of the U.S. and the private
sector to the very note. Today he returned from his second visit to
Miami this week: a conference of Caribbean Latin American Action (CLAA),
a business lobbying group which pushes assembly industries. Just Monday,
the president got back from the Americas Summit.
Both meetings were dominated by a pro-business, pro-U.S. tone,
and at the summit, Aristide's promise to follow strict neoliberal
policies was touted by the U.S. as a model.
The U.S. has good reason
to see him as such. Like all the other leaders (except Fidel Castro, who
was not invited), he signed a declaration pledging to make the
hemisphere a free trade zone
by 2005. In addition, today Leslie
Delatour, champion of neoliberalism, was appointed governor of the
Central Bank and last week, Le Nouvelliste reported that Haiti signed on
with the International Finance Corporation, a World Bank division which
helps sell off their public institutions.
In the realm of justice,
Aristide appears to be trying to preserve some space. At a mass on
Monday, he spoke about justice for practically the first time, pleading
people to bring your complaints
to the Justice Ministry and promising
to supply them with lawyers.
However, Aristide still has not announced any
government-sponsored investigations or openly supported the proposed
truth commission.
(The word is that the U.S. government is pressuring
the justice ministry to stall the commission.) In feeble reform
moves,
last week the old supreme court was replaced with a new
one, but with
judges from the same corrupt system, and some army officers, including
those associated with the coup, have been shifted around, but so far
only about 30 have been retired.
Another touchy issue between Aristide and the occupiers is
disarmament. Aristide has begged the U.S. to take guns away from the
paramilitary forces. That makes no sense, however, since the main
terrorist group, FRAPH (Front pour l'Avancement et le Progres Haitien)
was built up and organized by a CIA asset, and the chief repressive
force, the army, was trained and armed by the U.S. Now the government is
saying the new
Haitian army will do the disarmament - but that is
being trained by the very same masters: U.S. soldiers and police
officers.
A shift in
Washington and the recent visit by three high-ranking U.S. officials
(Strobe Talbott, John Deutch, Sandy Berger) appears to have brought
about a change in election plans. Instead of organizing a permanent
electoral council as planned, on Dec. 8 Aristide decreed a provisional
one should be arranged by Dec. 14. As of today, many of the nine members
were still unnamed.
The speed-up in the schedule may be due to pressure expected from the new Republican Congress which is threatening to pull the plug on Clinton's Haiti plans. It is said to oppose the occupation, all forms of aid and is dominated by enemies of Aristide. (The change could benefit the democratic movement, since it gives U.S. dollars less time to co-opt and influence.)
The construct of Aristide's cage is clearer than ever, and, as
might have been predicted, the U.S. has once again managed to keep most
cards in its hands. The president is at an impasse, and now he, and even
the U.N. - which has repeatedly called for disarmament, for example -
have to resort to exploiting the decreasing remaining space and to
relying on the good will
of the occupiers.