Message-Id: <l03130303b31012b0dd88@[149>152>128>20]>
To: [distribution list]
From: Evelyn Phillips <phillipse@ccsu>edu>
Subject: U>N> Criticism Angers Charities Buying Sudan Slaves’ Release
>Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 05:04:42 -0500
>From: Latir Downes-Thomas <latir@earthlink>net>
>Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc>
>To: Bush list <gampatriots@Sun>COM>
>Subject: U>N> Criticism Angers Charities Buying Sudan Slaves’ Release
UNITED NATIONS&38212;Private charities that are buying freedom for enslaved children and young women in Sudan have reacted angrily to recent criticism of them from UNICEF, the UN Children’s Fund
It is very difficult to understand why UNICEF should say our
activities are intolerable,
said John Eibner, head of Christian
Solidarity International, of Zurich, Switzerland, which since 1995 has
bought and set free 5,942 Sudanese children, spending about $50 a
child
What is intolerable is to leave these women and children in the
hands of brutal captors,
said Charles Jacobs of the American
Anti-Slavery Group in Boston, which helps raise money to support
Christian Solidarity
At a news briefing in Geneva in early February, a UNICEF spokeswoman,
Marie Heuzer, described the slave redemption program as
intolerable
after Christian Solidarity raised the topic by
appealing to Secretary General Kofi Annan to condemn slavery in Sudan
and to create a special program to trace and free enslaved women and
children
Thursday, a UNICEF spokesman, Peter Crowley, said the agency still has
genuine concerns
about buying freedom for children, adding that
they were shared by some human-rights organizations, including Human
Rights Watch
He said that buying back slaves did not offer a lasting
solution
to the problem, which he said can only come through
bringing about an end to Sudan’s on-again, off-again 30-year-old
civil war pitting the Muslim north of the country against the
Christian and animist south
The children were also being returned to villages that remain in the war zone and were subject to future slave raids
Another objection was one of principle, he said, because the buy-back program implicitly accepts that human beings may be bought and sold This could also encourage slave-taking for profit
Crowley argued that buying freedom does nothing to change the
underlying social attitudes
of a people who are used to owning
slaves and regard doing so as perfectly normal
UNICEF has also contended that redeeming slaves for money helped prolong the civil war by giving combatants extra cash for buying arms and ammunition But Christian Solidarity insists it pays for the slave it buys with Sudanese pounds to avoid introducing dollars into the region because they could be used for purchasing arms
Human Rights Watch emphasized that its own position on the slave
buying issue is nuanced
Reed Brody, the organization’s Advocacy Director, agreed that
buying back slaves creates a real danger of fueling a market in
human beings
in a country as desperately poor as Sudan
He called slavery there a very troubling issue
but said that
the real challenge it raises is that of finding an end to a long war
which he said neither side can ever hope to win
Brody pointed out that human-rights organizations and the UN Human Rights Commission have long been calling for international monitors to be sent to Sudan to trace children taken into slavery and secure their liberation But no action has been taken
In a 1996 report on slavery in North Africa, a representative of the Human Rights Commission accused Sudan’s government forces of regularly abducting and transferring women and children from southern conflict zones to the north, where they disappeared