Documents menu
Message-ID: <358D4C44.B73EE80F@mail.telepac.pt>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 19:09:08 +0100
Reply-To: jpmonteiro@mail.telepac.pt
Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@YORKU.CA>
From: João Paulo Monteiro <jpmonteiro@mail.telepac.pt>
Subject: Eric Lee's book on Internationalism
Comments: cc: MARXISM <marxism@lists.panix.com,
Eric Lee <ericlee@eindor.org.il>
To: LABOR-L@YORKU.CA
Eric Lee's book on Internationalism
By João Paulo Monteiro 21 June 1998
I have read with great pleasure and reward, Eric Lee's book 'The Labour
Movement and the Internet: the New Internationalism' (Pluto Press,
1997). I would advise it's reading to any labour activist and any
marxist.
The book first caught my attention because - as I have expressed
elsewhere a number of times - I share Lee's opinion that the rebirth of
the International will have to be based on the labour movement. That is,
we must go back to the same path followed by Marx's very own I
International (the International Workingmen's Association). The workers
will first of all unite internationally to defend their very immediate
economic interests. It is only in the development and deepening of this
struggle that a political platform will arise. The XX century saw the
complete short-circuiting of this path by the political
instrumentalization of the labour movement in the cold war and by the
confinement of marxist politics back into sectist cults. It's time to
start again.
The current offensive of international capital (globalization,
privatization, deregulation, downsizing, lean production, union busting,
compression of the real wages, etc.) will by itself create the dynamics
of class struggle that will compel the workers to seek international
solidarity. Of course, the new means of communication are a potent tool
at the disposal of labour activists and organizations. Eric Lee's
abundant anecdotal evidence of this in his book is compelling and his
proposals for new developments seem to be sound and exciting.
I would like to question him however on the final purposes of the "new
international" he envisages. Can we really honour Marx's project without
contemplating the goal of the complete emancipation of labour from the
yoke of capital?
Capitalism is a stagnating productive system, besieged by chronic
overproduction and declining rates of profit. For new leases of oxygen
it cannot but proceed with its continuous offensives against labour's
remuneration and rights, the pillage of non renewable natural resources
and imperialist aggression.
If we can organize a powerful labour movement (along with other social
"internationals" and movements of opinion) world wide that does fight
back and contains this so vital offensive for capital, we will surely
have to contemplate - sooner or later - capitalism's overthrow
altogether. That means the expropriation of the means of production and
can only take place with a political revolution and the installation of
what Marx called the dictatorship of the proletariat world wide. The
rule of the associations of free producers will then pave the way for
the abolition of the social classes and the advent of communism.
Day dreaming? Not at all. It's today's hard reality that compels us to
go back to the "old man". The modern revolution in communications is not
only good for labour activism. It puts the most vast possibilities, the
most wild "messianic" visions staring you in the face.
I am of the opinion that one must never lose all hope on a good social
democrat. So, to paraphrase the good marquis de Sade, I would like Eric
Lee to contemplate making this last effort - "encore un effort" - to be
a complete and consequent marxist.;-)
|