From LABOR-L@YORKU.CA Mon Jul 30 06:23:28 2001
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:52:36 -0400
Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@YORKU.CA>
From: Jim W. Jaszewski
<grok@SPRINT.CA>
Subject: Bush plans space bomber
To: LABOR-L@YORKU.CA
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:04:00 -0400
Sender: Marxism and Sciences <MARXISM-AND-SCIENCES@LISTSERV.CC.EMORY.EDU>
From: Charles Brown <CharlesB@CNCL.CI.DETROIT.MI.US>
Subject: Prehistory of Darth Vader
To: MARXISM-AND-SCIENCES@LISTSERV.CC.EMORY.EDU
The United States is exploring the development of a
space-bomber
which could destroy targets on the other side of
the world within 30 minutes.
As part of a weapons modernisation strategy personally directed by
Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the Pentagon is drawing up plans
for a sub-orbital vehicle
launched like a spacecraft, which
Rumsfeld describes as valuable for conducting rapid global
strikes.
The craft—which would set the scene for a new
generation of stratospheric warfare—would be able to drop
precision bombs from a height of 60 miles, flying at 15 times the
speed and 10 times the height of America's current bomber
fleet. It is unclear whether it would be manned.
Plans for the weapon appear to undermine claims that President George
Bush's controversial Missile Defence Screen—dubbed Son of
Star Wars
—is purely defensive.
The new plane could be developed quickly by adapting shelved research
for Ronald Reagan's Star Wars
together with plans for a
reusable spacecraft called the X-33 Venture Star, under development by
Nasa and Lockheed Martin.
It would drop bombs from such a height that they would act as
bunker busters,
penetrating deep into underground silos
without explosive warheads and causing massive pre-emptive damage on
the ground within minutes of the start of a conflict—indicating
a clear intention to take out enemy missiles before they have the
capacity to launch. It would also be out of reach of conventional air
defence systems.
The bomber could return to base in the US within 90 minutes from any point on the globe. In 1999 it took US bombers in Kosovo 24 hours to return to base in Missouri.
The development of the bomber—details of which have been obtained by the Los Angeles Times—has keen supporters, including the man tipped to be nominated by Rumsfeld as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Ralph Eberhardt, commander of Space Command.
Pentagon spokesman Admiral Craig Quigley is also optimistic, saying
the military couldn't get anything [to a war zone] faster than
this. It could be useful in any number of scenarios.
But the plan also touches many raw nerves, most obviously among those
who object to the militarisation of space, which Democrat Senate
leader Tom Daschle calls the single dumbest thing I've heard
from this administration.
The project's supporters deny that
the craft marks a move to militarise space, saying that its targets
would be on Earth and that it would not make a full orbit.
Last week the Pentagon announced its intention to test a space-based
laser weapon, capable of zapping incoming missiles, as early as 2005
at a cost of $110 million. The test would signal a return to the heart
of Reagan's Strategic Defence Initiative—the so-called
Star Wars
- of the early 1980s and constitute a clear and
offensive violation of the 1972 Anti Ballistic Missile Treaty with
Russia.
And, The Observer has learnt, US embassies have been instructed to
inform host governments that the administration intends to test not
just land-based missile interceptors, as it did two weekends ago, but
other technologies and basing modes
for such weapons.
As with many such projects, such as the Stealth bomber, the new craft
could bypass a Congressional veto by being included in the secret
black budget
of undeclared defence spending.
Dan Plesch, director of the British American Security Information
Council, said the development revealed that America was engaged in
military anarchism
and was seeking to dominate space militarily
before China or Russia were able to do so.
They are now engaged in a grossly militarised foreign policy which
seems to be their only reaction to global politics,
he said.