Date: Sat, 17 Oct 98 14:35:10 CDT
From: Progressive Response <irc1@zianet.com>
Subject: The Sanctions Debate
Article: 45520
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Message-ID: <bulk.18268.19981018121508@chumbly.math.missouri.edu>
[Ed. Note: The following is a transcript of a British Broadcasting
Corporation (BBC) On-Line interview with Denis Halliday, who resigned
as coordinator of the United Nations’ oil-for-food
program
in Iraq in protest over the impact of economic sanctions on Iraqi
civilians, September 30, 1998. Halliday, a 35-year United Nations
veteran, also presented his views at a Congressional forum on October
6, chaired by Congressman John Conyers.]
The outgoing coordinator of the UN oil-for-food deal in Iraq, Denis
Halliday, has launched a scathing attack on the policy of sanctions,
branding them a totally bankrupt concept.
In his surprise remarks, Denis Halliday said his 13-month stint had
taught him the damage and futility
of sanctions. It
doesn’t impact on governance effectively and instead damages the
innocent people of the country,
he told Reuters news agency. It
probably strengthens the leadership and further weakens the people of
the country.
Mr. Halliday, who has resigned after more than 30 years with the United Nations, leaves his post in Baghdad on Wednesday. He was coordinator of the program that allows Iraq to sell limited amounts of oil to buy food, medicine and other supplies.
He said maintaining the crippling trade embargo imposed on Iraq for its 1990 invasion of Kuwait was incompatible with the UN charter as well as UN conventions on human rights and the rights of the child.
But Mr. Halliday believes the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan favors a fresh look at sanctions as a means of influencing states to change their policies, in Iraq’s case making it scrap its weapons of mass destruction and long range missiles.
I’m beginning to see a change in the thinking of the United
Nations, the secretary general, many of the member states, who have
realized through Iraq in particular that sanctions are a failure and
the price you extract for sanctions is unacceptably high.
His comments follow criticism recently by a top UN weapons inspector, Scott Ritter, of the U.S. and UK for failing take a tougher line over the inspections [in Iraq].
Mr. Halliday said disarmament was a legitimate aim, but took issue
with the open ended
and politicized nature of weapons searches
in Iraq.
There is an awful incompatibility here, which I can’t quite
deal with myself. I just note that I feel extremely uncomfortable
flying the UN flag, being part of the UN system here,
he added.
Mr. Halliday said it was correct to draw attention to the 4,000 to
5,000 children dying unnecessarily every month due to the impact of
sanctions because of the breakdown of water and sanitation, inadequate
diet and bad internal health situation.
But he said sanctions were biting into the fabric of Iraqi society in other, less visible ways. He cited the disruption of family life caused by the departure overseas of two to three million Iraqi professionals.
He said sanctions had increased divorces and reduced the number of
marriages because couples could not afford to get wed. It has also
produced a new level of crime, street children, possibly even an
increase in prostitution,
he said.
This [Bagdad] is a town where people used to leave their key in the
front door, leave their car unlocked, where crime was almost unknown.
We have, through the sanctions, really disrupted this quality of life,
the standard of behavior that was common in Iraq before.
Mr. Halliday argued that the alienation and isolation of the
younger Iraqi generation of leadership
did not bode well for the
future. He said many senior government figures had been trained in the
West and exposed to the outside world. Their children had stayed at
home through the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, the 1991 Gulf War, and now
sanctions.
They don’t have a great deal of exposure to travel, even to
reading materials, television, never mind technological change,
he
said. I think these people are going to have a real problem in
terms of how to deal with the world in the near future.
Likening their introverted development to that of Afghanistan’s Taliban movement, Mr. Halliday said younger Iraqis were intolerant of what they considered their leaders’ excessive moderation. Mr. Halliday noted mosque attendance had soared during the sanctions era as people sought solace in religion—a change to Iraq’s hitherto largely secular coloring.
What should be of concern is the possibility at least of more
fundamentalist Islamic thinking developing,
he said. It is not
well understood as a possible spin-off of the sanctions regime. We are
pushing people to take extreme positions.