The Third WTO Ministerial, Seattle, 30 November to 3 December, 1999)
Hartford Web Publishing is not
the author of the documents in World
History Archives and does not presume to validate their
accuracy or authenticity nor to release their copyright.
- U.S. bombshell re WTO
- From Inside US Trade, 4 June 1999. U.S. Trade
Representative Charlene Barshefsky announced on June 1 that
the U.S. wants a “top-down” approach in
negotiations on eliminating barriers to trade in
services—meaning that rather than countries
negotiating on areas they all can agree they want
liberalized, all services will be put on the table at once,
including health and education.
- Open Letter from Open World Conference in
Defense of Trade Union Independence and Democratic Rights
(OWC)
- 27 August, 1999. The campaign to demand the ratification,
implementation and enforcement of the ILO Conventions.
- Three Months Until WTO Ministerial And Agenda
Differences Unresolved
- By Daniel Pruzin, Bureau of National Affairs, 30 August
1999. Big gaps remain within the WTO membership over what
negotiations should cover, how the talks should be carried
out, and whether any minor sectoral agreements should be
clinched as confidence-building measures in the run-up to
Seattle.
- Big Business and Democracy on Collision
Course at WTO
- By Danielle Knight, InterPress Serfice, 15 September
1999. Union leaders, environmentalists and lawmakers join
hands to strengthen opposition to further liberalisation of
trade rules at an upcoming session of the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) in Seattle.
- Labor Wants Seat at WTO Talks
- Washgington Post, 13 October
1999. Globalization of international commerce leaves labor
unions in a quandary. While trade can create jobs, unions
increasingly believe that global deals cut to foster trade
have few provisions to ensure that the rights of workers are
protected.
- For Seattle, Triumph and Protest
- New York Times 13 October 1999. The free
trade meeting has become a giant protest magnet for a broad
array of environmental, labor and other groups that say the
trade body is a handmaid to corporate interests whose
authority should be sharply curtailed.