The market and neo-liberalism
Hartford Web Publishing is not
the author of the documents in World
History Archives and does not presume to validate their
accuracy or authenticity nor to release their copyright.
- The Global Pillage: Whose ‘world
economy’ is it, anyway?
- By Tim Wheeler, People's Weekly World, 9
November 1996. NAFTA and the World Trade Organization (WTO)
are tools with which powerful corporations manipulate the
“free market” to control the flow of goods and
money around the globe.
- The Essence of Neoliberalism
- By Pierre Bourdieu, Le Monde diplomatique,
December 1998. This tutelary theory of neoliberalism is a
pure mathematical fiction. From the start it has been
founded on a formidable abstraction. For, in the name of a
narrow and strict conception of rationality as individual
rationality, it brackets the economic and social conditions
of rational orientations and the economic and social
structures that are the condition of their application.
- Pry Loose the Cold, Hard Fingers of the
Market's ‘Invisible Hand’
- By Frederick H. Borsch, Lost Angeles Times, 5
February 2001. Blind faith in an invisible hand becomes a
form of piety. One of the wonderful things about faith in
the hand is that it absolves humans of the responsibility of
doing the work of hard thinking and cooperative
planning.
- What is Neoliberalism? A Brief Definition for
Activists
- By Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo Garcia,
CorpWatch, 22 March
2001. “Neo-liberalism” is a set of economic
policies that have become widespread during the last 25
years or so. Although the word is rarely heard in the U.S.,
you can clearly see the effects of neo-liberalism here as
the rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer.
- The Capitalist Market
- By Frank Scott, Coastal Post, March 2001. Our
supposedly free market is really a fundamentalist religion,
with the strengths and weaknesses of any faith-based
system. Its foundation is equal parts mythology, creativity,
greed and stupidity. Believe that private initiative,
despite increasing signs of failure, is superior to social
control of life supporting institutions.
- The Enron of the Developing World
- By Robert Weissman, Washington Post, 25
September 2002. The era of market fundamentalism is
over. Marketization, deregulation and privatization, and the
opportunities for market manipulation offered by inadequate
regulation—all central elements in the rise and fall
of Enron—are now discredited in the United States. And
in developing countries, where their effects have been most
devastating, they are the object of widespread public
opprobrium.
- There Is No Invisible Hand
- By Joseph Stiglitz, Guardian, 20 December
2002. This year's Nobel Prize celebrates a critique of
simplistic market economics, just as last year's award
(of which I was one of the three winners) did. Last
year's laureates emphasised that different market
participants have different (and imperfect) information, and
these asymmetries in information have a profound impact on
how an economy functions. This year's winners discuss market
irrationality.
- From Keynesianism to Neoliberalism: Shifting
Paradigms in Economics
- By Thomas I. Palley, Foreign Policy in Focus,
May 2004. For the last 25 years, economic policy and the
public's thinking have been dominated by a conservative
economic philosophy known as neoliberalism. Contemporary
neoliberalism is principally associated with the Chicago
School of Economics, which emphasizes the efficiency of
market competition, the role of individuals in determining
economic outcomes, and distortions associated with
government intervention and regulation of markets.
- Super-sized: What happens when two billion
workers join the global labor market?
- By Thomas Palley, At Issue (United Auto
Workers), Thursday 29 September 2005. There is a famous
theorem in international economics—the
Stolper-Samuelson theorem—that says when a rich
capital-abundant country (such as the U.S.) trades with a
poor labor-abundant country (such as China), wages in the
rich country fall and profits go up.
- Baroque fantasies of a peculiar
science
- By Philip Ball, The Financial Times, 29
October 2006. It is easy to mock economic theory. Any fool
can see that the world of neoclassical economics, which
dominates the academic field today, is a gross caricature in
which every trader or company acts in the same
self-interested way—rational, cool, omniscient. It is
tempting to infer that the dominance of neoclassical theory
has political origins. But while it has justified many
rightwing policies, the truth goes deeper.
- The Road from Serfdom: Milton Friedman and
the Economics of Empire
- By Gred Grandin, Counterpunch, 17 November
2006. Milton Friedman had no idea that his six-day trip to
Chile in March 1975 would generate so much controversy. The
“Chicago Boys” began to gain real influence in
General Augusto Pinochet's military government. Critics
of both Pinochet and Friedman took Chile as proof positive
that the kind of free-market absolutism advocated by the
Chicago School was only possible through repression.