History of the world economy
Message-Id: <25031222195644@vms2.macc.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 1995 22:20:57 -0600
From: (Anj Petto) <ajpetto@macc.wisc.edu>
Subject: Horses and Euro/Native Contact
Horses and Euro/Native Contact
Citations compiled by by Andrew J. Petto 12 March 1995.
Key references for this subject include some oldy goldies:
- John Ewers: The Horse in Blackfeet Indian Culture (Smithsonian, 1985)
Frank
Raymond Secoy: Changing Military Patterns on the Great Plains (17th-19th c)
(Monographs of the AES, 1953) Bernard Mishkin: Rank and Warfare Among the
Plains Indians (Monographs of the AES, 1940)
These are not so much about cultural ecology, but may contain some leads. I
can't think of more recent treatments off hand, but if you hear of any I'd
be curious to hear what they are.
Ann McMullen
Curator of North American Ethnology, Milwaukee Public Museum
annmcm@mpm1.mpm.edu
-
There's a nice essay by the late Symmes C. Oliver entitled: "Ecology and
Cultural Continuity as Contributing Factors in the Social Organization of
the Plains Indians" appearing in University of California Publications in
American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 48 (1) 1962. It was reprinted in
Yehudi Cohen's Man in Adaptation:The Cultural Present (Aldine: 1968).
Best, Dave Smith
- There was an interesting piece comparing the changes that came with the
horse on the Plains, with the early Kurgan culture. The reference is
"Kurgan Culture" and the Horse." Current Anthropology Vol. 27, No. 4,
August-October, 1986.
Yours, Ray Scupin
Sociology/Anthropology Dept.,
Lindenwood College,
209 S. Kingshighway
St. Charles, MO 63301
314-949-4730 (Office);
314-949-9244 (Home);
314-949-4910 (Fax)
-
Graham, R.B. Cunninghame. THE HORSES OF THE CONQUEST (American edition
published by University of Oklahoma Press, 1949. First published in England
in 1930).
Anita Cohen-Williams; Reference Services; Hayden Library Arizona State
University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1006 PHONE: (602) 965-4579 FAX: (602) 965-9169
INTERNET: IACAGC@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU Owner: HISTARCH
-
An interesting article on the horse culture is by either Patricia Albers or
Beatrice Medicine titled "When The Horse Came Hell Began" which
"deconstructs" the sexism of the squaw image perpetrated by white
historians and ethnographers. It appeared in the Montana Journal. It gives
a more reasoned view of the impact wrought by the horse culture on Native
Americans.
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 95 09:10:57
From: tkavanag@ucs.indiana.edu
Subject: More on Horses and Women on the Plains
The article in question is "Hell Came with Horses: Plains Indian Women in
the Equestrian Era" by Dr. Margot Liberty (_Montana_, 1982). It is a good
article for a state history magazine. But I don't think Margot would call
it exactly "'[deconstucting]' the sexism of the squaw image"; indeed, I
don't think she uses the word 'squaw' at all. What she does point out is
that
Plains Indian cultures of classic times have been so male- dominated in
their general image as to almost totally obscure the women who constituted
the other half of the story.
Note that it is not simply "white historians and ethnographers" who
produced this skewed result, but the classic Plains cultures were
themselves male-dominated.
Her basic argument is that
[in Paleo times] small hunting and gathering bands in which relative
equality between men and women prevailed. From this baseline the addition
of river bottom gardening technology ... allowed women in some groups ...
to increase their personal contribution to the basic food supply and thus
to rise in prestige ... The hunting and gathering peoples, meanwhile,
continued the old traditions, until the introduction of horses created a
genuine revolution. There was then geometric expansion of ... male and
warrior enterprises ... led to a sharp plunge in women's rights and
prerogatives. The gardening tribes were badly shattered by invasion and
disease during equestrian times, but women's status among them appears to
have remained at a relatively high level.
My own concern is the image of the Paleo group as "small hunting and
gathering bands." If the reconstruction suggested in my other post is
valid, then Paleo groups, such as the group that produced the
Olsen-Chubbock site, could have been upwards of several hundred people.
This, of course, says nothing about the relative egalitarism within the
group.
On the other hand, it certain is probable that with the increased
production of buffalo hides for sale/trade to Euro-Americans that came in
the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was an increased demand for
women's labor as hide dressers. But this did not result in an increased
status for the indidivual woman, rather it resulted in polygamy.
Thomas Kavanagh,
Curator of Collections
Mathers Museum,
Indiana University
-
Warning LONG POST!
Andrew Petto asks about review articles on horses on the Plains.
Unfortunately, there are no good recent ones. Most folks would begin with
Chad Oliver's 1962 "Ecology and Cultural Continuity..." However, there are
serious flaws with that argument, most seriously because he begins with the
Mooney- Kroeber-Eggan-Lowie position that the Plains were unoccupied before
the horse, or at best by 'skulkers in the woods.' Moreover, as Waldo Wedel
has pointed out, this model is more the result of the absence of
archaeological evidence.
A more ecologically sound model would take into account the interactiosn
between several variables: buffalo, horses, and people.
Since earliest times resource domains on the Plains have been derived from
the buffalo. Unfortunately, there are no good first-hand descriptions of
hunting until the nineteenth century, long after the addition of the horse.
But several general inferences can be made from other sources. While
individual or small group stalking is no doubt of extreme antiquity, the
most productive pre-horse hunting technique was the trap, fall, or pound
(Ewers 1955:302-4). The archaeological evidence for the productivity of
pre-horse buffalo hunting techniques reaches back to at least the
Olsen-Chubbock event, ca. 8500 B. C. That day, almost 200 animals were
killed; the 150 fully butchered animals yielded some 60,000 pounds of
"usable" meat, plus another 10,000 pounds of tallow, marrow, and "variety"
meat. Depending upon several variables, including percentage of meat
preserved and the presence of dogs, the product could have fed 50
people--with no dogs--for over three months, or 100 people and 100 dogs for
22 days (Wheat 1972:121). Even then, only 75 of the kill was butchered, 150
animals out of 200 killed, a probably standard percentage; fuller
utilization of the kill might have added another several thousand pounds of
meat, with a concomitant increase in either the supportable population or
the duration of the organization, but not both.
Such hunts required organization and coordination. They required investment
in an infrastructure, at least a knowledge of the potentials of the terrain
for traps or falls, greater for an investment of labor in the corral,
pound, and drive lines. They required an ideology and social structure that
could mobilize and organize the combined labor of a number of people.
Ethno- historically reported communal pounds and drives among horse poor
groups were under the direction of the "pound-maker," often, but not
necessarily, a shaman, who distributed the meat and hides to all present
for further processing and final consumption. Such an economy was
redistributional, with a flow into and out of a center. In turn, the
control of this redistribution would have been the source of political
power. Depending on specific conditions, a trap needed at least 24 grown
males (Frison 1971:89). Lowie (1909) reported that the horse-poor
Assiniboines made drive lines two miles long which were manned every ten
feet; this is probably an over-generalization, for at such figures, some
2,112 people would have been required for the lines. Even at twice the
distance between drivers, several hundred people would have been required.
However, depending upon the successes of the hunts, such large numbers of
people could have been supported by the technology, and there is
ethnohistorical evidence for large assemblages. Arthur (1975:111) notes
that "the Assiniboine were noted for their large winter camps," often in
the range of 200- 300 lodges. At 8 persons per lodge, some 1,600-2,400
people could have been in these camps.
It was into such a situation that horses were introduced. The initial
effect of the horse would have been to expand the range of search parties
and to ease the job of maneuvering the animals to the traps. In doing so,
the horse would have added a new source of economic and political power: by
controlling access to his horses, a horse owner--there are no reports of
communal ownership of horses--could control access to the products of the
hunt. But as the horse population grew, the necessity of cooperation in
buffalo hunting decreased: individual horse- mounted buffalo hunters could
produce as much as pedestrian communal hunts with significantly less
infra-structural and structural costs. Thus, in political terms, the horse
would have democratized access to the buffalo, transforming its economic
role from being the basis of the political economy to being primarily an
object in the domestic economy.
However, other processes intervened. The largest post-horse hunts were the
so-called running hunts, in which mounted hunters charged the herds in a
coordinated attack under the direction of a chief hunter, and with the
enforcement of hunt rules by a police force. The political importance of
these hunts lies not in their productive activity--a single horse mounted
hunter was more efficient in terms of input/output ratios--but in their
restrictions upon that production. As in the coincident economic revolution
in Euro-America, having access to the means of production was not
sufficient to control political power, restricting access of others was
equally important in maintaining power. This is what the men's
societies-as-police did. As Ewers notes of the Blackfeet,
police regulation of the summer hunt . . . preserved the fiction of equal
opportunity for all. Actually, it enabled the owner of the fastest running
horse to get first chance at the herd and deprived the poor man, who owned
no buffalo horse of the right to hunt. It is obvious that under such
conditions the poor would have been much worse off then they would have
been under pre-horse conditions, when every family participated actively in
the hunt and shared of its spoils, unless special provisions were made for
their benefit. The Blackfoot adopted two measures necessary for the welfare
of the poor: (1) the loaning of buffalo horses . . . and (2) the
presentation of outright gifts of meat. [1955:305]
In adding to the prestige of the already wealthy, these "special
provisions" served to maintain the existing distribution of social power as
well as drawing supporters into the circle of power. Thus, although buffalo
retained an importance in the household domestic economy and in the
cosmology after the introduction of the horse, they constituted a direct
political resource domain only insofar as access was controllable.
The advent of the horse meant that controlling access to the buffalo was
transformed from a direct to an indirect political resource domain;
conversely, insofar as changes in domestic economy could affect the
political climate, the buffalo retained a political significance. One of
the most historically important of such changes was that by the first third
of the nineteenth century, the "Little Ice Age" precipitation cycle, begun
in the 1500s and resulting in increased buffalo and human populations, had
reversed. This initiated a general decline in the buffalo carrying capacity
leading to increasing pressures on the herds by the existing human
population. This pressure was exacerbated by first the forced migration of
eastern Indians, and later by the presence of white hide hunters. These
latter not only decimated the remaining herds, but their very commercial
activity bypassed the Indians as producers of hides, whose trade had been
an important source of individual income, and whose control was an
important political resource domain for their chiefs.
At the same time, given an increased population in the period 1500-1800,
there would also be increased intergroup pressures; thus one would expect
wars of territorial exclusion, and with increasingly structured military
actions (Reher 1977:35). The appearance of stockaded villages on the Middle
Missouri during this period, antedating the horse, suggests such pressures.
Increased tensions would also place a value on military capability.
Pre-horse battles on the Plains were fought between opposing lines of what
may be called heavy infantry, armored and with shields, who shot arrows at
each other from the protection of a shield wall until "one chief decided to
substitute shock for fire" and ordered a charge. The battle then ended with
a hand-to-hand melee (Thompson 1916; Secoy 1953:34).
The horse would not have immediately disrupted the aboriginal military
patterns. Along with the horse came the heavy cavalry tactics of the
Spaniards including mass shock attacks by leather-armored horsemen (Secoy
1953:18). Like the heavy infantry tactics of pre-horse battles, these
depended on discipline and coordination for their effectiveness, and
required definite leadership. But the use of such heavy cavalry tactics by
Indians would have been offset until the number of horses available
surpassed a certain undefinable risk level; if horses were primarily used
in hunting, there was a risk to their economic value in using them in
warfare. Later, however, the general mode of acquisition of the horse by
aiding emphasized the light cavalry tactics stereotypical of later Plains
warfare. Such coordinated efforts were maintained for the large-scale wars.
Moreover, soon after the introduction of the horse came that of the gun,
providing both a long range defense against the shock tactics of heavy
cavalry as well as emphasizing the value of light tactics.
Shimkin (1947) described the interaction of these forces, "More horses
would have meant closer pursuit of the buffalo, better defense in war . . .
but also less fodder per head, consequently more frequent moving, and
temptation to horse raiders. Fewer horses would have meant longer stays,
but poorer defense, less close pursuit of the buffalo" (1947:268). Thus, by
devaluating the prestige system built on the relative number of horses
owned, by devaluating the need for social nucleation in hunting, and simply
because increased horses put a strain on the immediate resources, increased
absolute numbers of horses were a force for atomization. Counterposed were
forces stressing societal maintenance. In particular, the increased
population density brought about by both internal population growth and by
migration to the Plains by peripheral peoples brought increased pressures
towards military organization and tribal nationalism.
Thomas Kavanagh,
Curator of Collections
Mathers Museum,
Indiana University
Andrew J. Petto, PhD,
Associate Director
Center for Biology Education
666 WARF, University of Wisconsin
610 North Walnut Street
MADISON WI 53705-2397
Voice: 608.263-0478
Fax: 608.262-0014
Internet: ajpetto@macc.wisc.edu
Bitnet: ajpetto@wiscmacc
|