History of the world economy
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 16:46:23 -0500
From: ljohnsto@gac.edu (Louis Johnston)
To: Multiple recipients of list (econhist.macro@cs.muohio.edu)
Subject: new NBER paper
Historical Macroeconomics and American Macroeconomic History
NBER working paper No. 4935, November 1994, by Charles W.
Calomiris and Christopher Hanes
Abstract forwarded by Louis Johnston
Department of Economics and Management
Gustavus Adolphus College
St. Peter, MN 56082 (507) 933-7436 ljohnsto@gac.edu
On Monday I mentioned that there is a new NBER working paper
that I think everyone interested in macro history should look at. It
is: Charles W. Calomiris and Christopher Hanes, HISTORICAL
MACROECONOMICS AND AMERICAN MACROECONOMIC HISTORY. NBER Working
Paper No. 4935, November 1994.
Abstract
What can macroeconomic history
offer macroeconomic theorists and macroeconometricians? Macroeconomic
history offers more than longer time series or special "controlled
experiments." It suggests an historical definition of the economy,
which has implications for macroeconometric methods. The defining
characteristic of the historical view is its emphasis on "path
dependence": ways in which the cumulative past, including the history of
shocks and their effects, change the structure of the economy. This
essay reviews American macroeconomic history to illustrate its potential
uses, and to draw out methodological implications. "Keynesian"
models can account for the most obvious cycle patterns in all historical
periods, while "new classical" models cannot. Nominal wage rigidity was
important historically and some models of wage rigidity receive more
support from history than others. A shortcoming of both Keynesian and
new-classical approaches is the assumption that low-frequency change is
exogenous to demand. The history of the Kuznets cycle illustrates how
aggregate-demand shocks can produce endogenous changes in aggregate
supply. Economies of scale, learning effects, and convergences of
expectations -- many within the spatial contexts of city building and
frontier settlement -- seem to have been especially important in making
the aggregate supply "path-dependent." Institutional innovation
(particularly government regulation) has been another source of
endogenous change in aggregate supply. The historical
view's emphasis on endogenous structural change points in the direction
of a greater use of panel and cross-section analysis over short sample
periods to identify the sources and consequences of macroeconomic
shocks. Charles W. Calomiris Department of Finance University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 340 Commerce West Champaign,
IL 61820 and NBER Christopher Hanes Department of
Economics University of Pennsylvania 3718 Locust Walk Philadelphia,
PA 19104
|