Documents menu
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 97 23:30:25 CST
From: rich@pencil.gwu.edu (Rich Winkel)
Subject: Aussie Construction Workers Unite Against Mobil
/** labr.global: 408.0 **/
** Topic: Aussie Construction Workers Unite Against Mobil **
** Written 10:03 AM Mar 4, 1997 by labornews in cdp:labr.global **
From: Institute for Global Communications <labornews@igc.apc.org>
Subject: Aussie Construction Workers Unite Against Mobil
Mobil's use of workplace act stopped
By Dave Mizon, in ICG Labour News
4 March 1997
MELBOURNE -- At a mass meeting held at Williamstown Hall on February
14, more than 400 workers, members of the Construction, Forestry,
Mining and Energy Union, the Electrical Trades Union and the
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union, agreed on a settlement in the
long-running dispute with Mobil-Toyo.
The dispute began when antagonisms between the construction company,
John Hollands, and engineering contractor Toyo and Mobil came to a
head over the construction of Mobil's new catalytic cracker.
In November, John Hollands was terminated as building contractor, and
the existing work force was paid out. Mobil and Toyo opened up
discussions with unions, proposing a site agreement inferior to the
existing agreement and making it clear that they would employ an
entirely new work force.
Mobil also began proceedings under section 166 of the old Industrial
Relations Act, seeking damages against the unions through the civil
courts.
On January 1, Mobil was the first company to use the new industrial
relations legislation. If successful, the company would have been able
to bar industrial action of any kind for six months.
Despite the threat of legal action, Mobil and Toyo were pushed back to
the negotiating table by the tremendous solidarity shown by the
construction workers of the three unions. At no time were the
companies able to get more than 20 to 30 scabs on a site that once
employed 400 workers.
The settlement, overwhelmingly endorsed at the February 14 meeting,
involves a compromise.
The construction contract has been awarded to four separate contract
firms which employ core work crews. However, these workers must be
permanent, so the site is not casualised. The rest of the work force
required at the site will be made up of sacked workers from the
original crew, so 70% of the new work force will be made up of ex-John
Holland workers.
The company has agreed to drop all legal action, and the new site
agreement involves no loss in conditions and an increase in wages.
The organiser for the CFMEU at the site, Dave Noonan, told Green Left
Weekly that since the election of the Liberal government there is a
"trend amongst employers to litigate rather than negotiate".
The outcome of this dispute "must make Mobil and the other big
companies think long and hard before using this legislation. The
legislation may financially cripple union organisations, but it can't
cow a work force, and that's who the companies have to deal with on a
day to day basis."
Greenleft
|