Labor history of Aotearoa - New Zealand
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 19:10:56 +0000
Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@YORKU.CA>
From: LabourNet <chrisbailey@GN.APC.ORG>
Subject: New Zealand Seafarers faces Port Authorities lawsuit
New Zealand Seafarers Job Fight Faces Port Authorities Lawsuit
LabourNet interview by Greg Dropkin
20 December 1997
Four major port authorities in New Zealand have combined forces to bring a
lawsuit against the New Zealand Seafarers Union claiming loss of revenue
due to actions taken by their members in defense of jobs.
The authorities of Auckland, Lyttleton, Tangaroa, and Wellington, claim
that by picketting and delaying vessels, seafarers have stopped port
employees (wharfies) from gaining access to their rightful workplace. The
authorities are public bodies funded by rates levied on the local
community, which includes seafarers, and their legal action serves the
interests of major shipping lines seeking to undercut and replace the
Seafarers Union.
The actions concerned ships carrying trans-Tasman cargo, using Flag of
Convenience vessels to replace Australian and New Zealand crewed boats. The
replacement ships normally carry Filipino crews.
Mike Williams of the New Zealand Seafarers Union commented: "Some of the
crews are organised through unions based in the Philippines and we support
the ITF campaign for minimum standards agreements to cover these vessels.
We believe we should have a level playing field, and we are actually trying
to help the Filipino crews to achieve higher wages. We have intervened in
disputes on their vessels through the ITF.
"During the recent ITF Week of Action (19-26 November), inspections
revealed details of health and safety, wages, and welfare on Flag of
Convenience vessels and our union was able to help compel shipowners to
sign ITF agreements. But even on the ITF minimum wages, seafarer's pay
would still fall far below New Zealand or Australian standards."
In fact freight rates are so low that even if crew labour costs are
discounted, Australian and New Zealand ships would be unable to compete due
to tax concessions on the FoC vessels.
"We were in conflict with the American Star, owned by the Blue Star Line
(a UK company chaired by Lord Vestey) flying a Panamanian flag. The
Panamanian authority has reduced safety and environmental standards and the
flag allows shipowners to evade tax which would be levied if it were UK
registered. The shippers long term strategy is to achieve a monopoly
excluding any Australian or New Zealand involvement, after which their
freight rates will undoubtedly rise."
"If we don't defend our jobs, we will actually be wiped out. We feel we
have the democratic right to peaceful protest to defend our jobs and we
will continue to uphold this right."
The court hearings are due early next year.
LabourNet interview by Greg Dropkin
|